r/worldnews
•
u/green_flash
•
Jan 28 '23
•
1
1
Finland’s foreign minister hints that Russia may have been involved in last week’s Quran-burning protest that threatens to derail Sweden’s accession to NATO: "This is unforgivable,” Haavisto says. Russia/Ukraine
https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2023/01/28/Finland-hints-at-Russia-s-involvement-in-Quran-burning-protest-in-Sweden8.3k
u/flukshun
Jan 28 '23
•
And it's unacceptable that's it's so easy to derail NATO accession based on stupid antics. This is not acceptable or tenable
3.9k
u/OneTime_AtBandCamp Jan 28 '23
Turkey didn't want to let them in. The Quran incident was just a pretext. They would have found another reason to say no.
1.8k
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23
Turkey will let them in eventually when people have forgotten about it again. It's all about the Turkish elections in May this year.
523
u/NeilDeCrash Jan 28 '23
I have growing feeling that this has more than meets the eye.
Nord stream gets blown up. Russia is suddenly about to build the biggest gas hub in Europe to Turkey. Turkey blocks Sweden/Finland.
"Speaking at the Russian Energy Week forum, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed creating the largest gas hub in Europe in Turkey and redirecting the volume of gas, the transit of which is no longer possible through the Nord Stream, to this hub."
→ More replies359
u/redwashing Jan 28 '23
It's a bit more complicated than that. It is very difficult for Turkey to take any stance in this war with its economy as weak as it is. There are some advantages like being the middle man in selling "definitely not Russian I promise" gas to Europe, but there are many other factors too. It can't take a stance, can't take a pro-Russia stance either. It has to somehow make both sides happy.
Gas and oil is ofc and important part of the equation. Another one is agricultural trade, both imports and exports, Russia is #1 trade partner of Turkey in that. Turkey buys grains and sells vegatables/fruits/processed food. And #2 partner in agricultural trade for Turkey? That's Ukraine. In tourism Russia is #1 source of tourists, Ukraine is #3. Construction sector, both important partners. Defense industry, both very important. Turkey can't say fuck off to either of them so it has to play this balance game, with a third grade diplomat in Erdoğan no less. Can't say fuck off to Sweden and Finland, but can't say yes either. Has to stall somehow. This quran burning stuff is the perfect excuse, Erdoğan could kiss the guy who staged it.
72
u/ElegantBiscuit Jan 28 '23
Agreed. Turkey is a on a bit of a precipice economically and Erdogan is on a similar political precipice. Any move away from Russia in which Russia retaliates economically might hurt Russia, but it'll hurt Turkey way more. That means Turkey would have to turn towards the EU instead of trying to play this balancing act which has allowed it to stay relatively geopolitically independent. And the European financial aid to plug the gaps of a Russian economic war would certainly come with strings attached which will come at the personal detriment to Erdogan and his power.
→ More replies169
u/ChainChompskey Jan 28 '23
While everything you said is pretty much true, it's worth noting that Turkey put itself in this position. It's been playing both sides for decades, which has given it an outsized impact on geopolitical events given the relative size of their economy. Now it finds itself in an uncomfortable position where both its parents are fighting, and the one with the money is winning.
102
u/redwashing Jan 28 '23
It's hard to pretty much neighbor Russia and not trade with it a lot but yeah, the Georgia war should've been taken as a strong sign for diversification of trade. I expected this whole thing to blow in Turkey's face sooner tbh but stuff like selling Ukraine UAVs and solving the grain shipment crisis is letting Turkey stay in limbo.
Now Sweden just allowed this to continue longer. "We're not telling you no Sweden, just asking you to resolve the toughest intellectual issue of the 21st century in the Western world in balancing hate speech adn free speech, then you can join". If they manage to do that, Turkey should ask them to bring peace to the Middle East lol.
58
u/Daemonic_One Jan 28 '23
The point of every comment above you is that Sweden didn't allow shit. This is all Erdogan all the time. He could ignore the actions of a bunch of foreign dipshits, but instead he's beating the Theocratic Nationalist drum for May. Watch for this all to be resolved the moment the election is over and he has extorted sufficient concessions from the US and Europe.
Edit: letter
20
→ More replies23
u/robeph Jan 28 '23
Байрактар. Enough said. There was praise for Turkey's assistance to Ukraine with its drones. This was more than just playing both sides. Those drones did well in Ukriane against Russia.
26
u/ChainChompskey Jan 28 '23
Providing drones, then throwing every wrench they can possibly find into the works to block Finland & Sweden from joining NATO is absolutely playing both sides.
→ More replies943
u/orojinn Jan 28 '23 •
![]()
Staged Election you mean where Erodogan wins by 117%... Let's not fool ourselves turkey is a dictatorship and frankly it should be kicked the fuck out of NATO.
655
u/CzusAguster Jan 28 '23 •
![]()
Turkey is only part of NATO because of its strategic importance. If they joined with Russia, that would be very bad for the west.
392
u/iCANNcu Jan 28 '23
And very bad for Turkey which Erdogan knows.
250
u/OldMcFart Jan 28 '23
But probably good for Erdogan's pockets. Like any authoritarian leader, I don't think he cares about his country one bit.
29
u/maxToTheJ Jan 28 '23
His pockets are already lined. He doesn’t need to be involved in Russian kleptocracy where he might end up dying from falling from a ground story window
24
u/OldMcFart Jan 28 '23
People like him don't think that way. They always want more, and more, and more. Look at Putin. Why would he not just enjoy life as a ultra-wealthy dictator, instead of risking it with a war with Ukraine and by extension the west? Because people like them always think they can get more without going too far.
183
u/iCANNcu Jan 28 '23
I doubt it. Turkey still very dependant On US military aid. Erdogan's power would be threatened without support from The West.
87
u/OldMcFart Jan 28 '23
Certainly, hence his balancing the knife's edge, lining his pockets every which way he can manage.
6
u/dla3253 Jan 28 '23
Yeah, Erdogan is only out for himself and knows that Turkey's, and thus his, significance on the international stage right now is due to its strategic location in the East-West conflict. Playing both sides against each other is in his interests.
→ More replies10
u/EnragedZeus05 Jan 28 '23
Yeah. I read some months ago a number of countries canceled contracts for Russian weapons and went to Germany/France/America/any where else. I don’t think anyone wants Russian weapons now.
→ More replies7
u/marco_sikkens Jan 28 '23
Yeah except the fact that Poetin only wants puppets he can control leading friendly countries. Erdogan would probably 'fall' out of a window at some point.
3
u/OldMcFart Jan 28 '23
Yeah, except never underestimate someone old in a game where people die young. Erdogan's been around for a while, he's purged the ranks several times. Assad as well for comparison. Putin's power isn't endless. Not even close as recent events have shown with undeniable clarity. At this time, Erdogan sits safely in Isengard, but does his master's bidding whether he wants to or not.
6
u/TheSkyPirate Jan 28 '23
I mostly agree, but Turkey is pretty strong at this point. If the war in Ukraine ended today the theoretical strength of Turkish forces probably exceeds that of Russian forces.
→ More replies3
u/MediocreContent Jan 28 '23
Man, I remember when I was in the military and that whole coup thing occurred. Forgot which year, but I remember our nukes there were a hot button issue when it was happening.
45
u/BocciaChoc Jan 28 '23
People know so little of the history of Russia and Turkey where they suggest they would team up.
→ More replies33
u/kaiser41 Jan 28 '23
It's a military alliance, not a social club. Everyone is in it for strategic importance, or at least that's how it should be. It's not in NATO members' interests to let in countries that will be a military liability.
Not to say that Sweden and Finland wouldn't pull their weight (and being able to base stuff in their country is probably good enough even if they didn't have militaries), but this "Turkey is only in it because of their big army and strategically vital geographic features" refrain isn't the dunk on Turkey that people think it is.
→ More replies17
u/sailing_by_the_lee Jan 28 '23
Turkey allying with Russia would be very bad for Turkey. Russia is a fading power, the losing side. There is zero chance that Turkey would ally with Russia. Most of Turkey's military equipment is of American or European origin, and it would be a disaster for them if they lost access to spare parts and upgrades, not to mention western intelligence and the NATO nuclear umbrella. Turkey has a long, as well as recent, history of military coups (4 times since 1960, and an attempt as recently as 2016). There is no chance that Turkey's military would tolerate Erdogan fucking up relations with the West so badly as to put Turkey's national security at risk. Especially not because of some provocation over the Quran.
Regardless, there is no rush to admit Sweden and Finland to NATO. The US and EU have already extended military protection to them in the interim.
→ More replies24
61
u/orojinn Jan 28 '23
The same Russia that's losing the battle to Ukraine with its shitty military hardware? The Turkish generals know they would not stand a chance against NATO itself because they already know the power of NATO. For all we know triggering NATO into removing Turkey might actually get the General's attention and stop supporting Erdogan
→ More replies59
u/Seanspeed Jan 28 '23
Turkey is a pretty big military power. And it's not just military, it's also their geopolitical importance. Having them allied with Russia would be pretty bad. Ukraine could be completely blocked from utilizing their Black Sea ports, for instance.
30
u/DsutetcipE Jan 28 '23
People don’t realize how big the Turkish army is, and how strategically significant Istanbul is. There is a reason the Romans build that city, and later became the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire.
25
u/traversecity Jan 28 '23
7th BCE, Greeks built Byzantine, later in around 300 CE, the Roman Constantine arrived, Constantinople.
Such a great place for a city and fortress then and now.
19
u/DsutetcipE Jan 28 '23
Yes, you are right, Constantine recognized the strategic value and invested in it, thanks for the correction!
→ More replies6
u/BeignetsByMitch Jan 28 '23
So you're telling me Istanbul was Constantinople? Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople?
→ More replies14
→ More replies12
u/rgpc64 Jan 28 '23
Their stategic location on the black sea is far less critical than it once was.
→ More replies6
u/BocciaChoc Jan 28 '23
More so once this war is over, Ukraine has wonderful access to the Blacksea.
→ More replies19
u/ezrs158 Jan 28 '23
I don't think the Black Sea itself is the strategic value. It's the straits connecting the Black Sea to the Mediterranean which are critical, and both Russia and Ukraine depend on it.
→ More replies80
u/musingmarkhor Jan 28 '23
Yeah, I don't think you've seen the results of a single Turkish election. Erdogan's party has always won somewhere between 40% to 50% of votes in general elections whenever they were in power. He may even struggle pretty hard in the upcoming elections, hence why he's trying really hard to show off a sense of having power. While Erdogan does have an autocratic-like presidency, let's not be completely oblivious to reality. The leaders of main opposition parties in Turkey, many who are secularist, also condemned what happened in Sweden. Moreover, there is a shared sentiment that Sweden needs to do something about what they see as PKK elements in their country.
→ More replies13
u/zoomercide Jan 28 '23
Though they’re nowhere near as fraudulent as OP claims, it would be equally “oblivious to reality” to not at least question the integrity of Turkish elections, particularly the 2017 and 2018 elections: According to one methodologically rigorous study,
…the magnitude of … statistical aberrations might have been just large enough to change the outcome of the referendum from ‘No’ to ‘Yes’ for the 2017 constitutional referendum. These findings are corroborated by similar results in the 2018 presidential and parliamentary elections for voter rigging and ballot stuffing…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173410/pdf/pone.0204975.pdf
Regardless of their procedural integrity, it’s indisputable that Erdogan has restricted the fundamental freedoms of speech, press, and assembly on which fair elections—really, democracy itself—are predicated. Unsurprisingly, those are the same fundamental freedoms that Sweden would have to suspend in order to meet all of Erdogan’s demands. And if, like you implied, Turkish people of all political stripes truly share that sentiment, then it further underscores Turkey’s incompatibility with NATO, whose members are
determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilization of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law
and are expected to “[strengthen] their free institutions” and “[bring] about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded.”
38
7
60
u/IdreamofFiji Jan 28 '23
Turkey sucks but they are very important to NATO and have fulfilled all their commitments, can't say that about everybody.
→ More replies38
u/daBriguy Jan 28 '23
This is such a bad take. First off, whether we like it or not Turkey is an essential strategic ally in an incredibly important geographical region. Secondly, Turkey is one of the only links between the west and the Islamic countries. We can’t afford to lose them as an ally despite these middle school antics
→ More replies4
7
u/Puzzleheaded_Try9958 Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
Ffs, I hate Erdogan. I can't wait to see him lose but the elections are not staged. I don't understand how you guys can be so confidant in things you have no idea about. Him winning the elections is not a surprise because he has a really strong following. Even people who are not happy with the current state of the country are supporting him blaming others. It is mind boggling but unfortunately it is what it is. And opposition being useless doesn't help.
→ More replies→ More replies8
u/sw04ca Jan 28 '23
Why would you kick Turkey for the sake of Sweden and Finland, when Turkey is so much more important than they are, from a strategic point of view? Closing off the Black Sea is a pretty big deal, and the US bases in Turkey are no joke either.
12
3
→ More replies7
u/Killersavage Jan 28 '23
Who is even running against Erdogan? Or who is the front runner? I feel like the fact no one mentions this person means Erdogan probably doesn’t have much to worry about.
26
u/Mysteryman64 Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
Guy named Ekrem Imamoglu seems to be the popular opposition candidate, although I don't know if he's announced his intention to run yet. Most of the polling I've seen actually shows him beating Erdogan in the second round after all candidates would fail to get majority in the first and it goes to run off.
Erdogan is pushing real hard to get him disqualified from being able to run, hopefully disqualifying him at the very last second so the opposition can't field another candidate in time.
8
u/MentLDistortion Jan 28 '23
Kemal Kilicdaroglu, Leader of CHP. Not announced officially but it's definitely him. The most mentioned candidates are Kemal Kilicdaroglu, Meral Aksener (İYİ Parti Leader, nationalist centre-right), Ekrem İmamoğlu (CHP Istanbul Mayor) and Mansur Yavas (CHP Ankara Mayor, Nationalist). İYİ Parti and CHP are in an alliance (there are 4 other parties as well but the big deal is CHP and İYİ Parti)
Most polls show that both AKP and the opposition can't win without the HDP votes (mostly Kurds). Kurds will mostly vote for the opposition. HDP announced several times that they will support whoever is against Erdogan in the second tour. They did mention one time that if the candidate who runs against Erdogan is a nationalist they won't vote. So Mansur Yavas and Meral Aksener seems to be out of the equation. Ekrem İmamoglu got a political ban and conviction that would block his candidacy. However the proceedings will still take a while. It's not res judicata yet but still opposition will most likely not risk it. So that pretty much leaves us with Kilicdaroglu.
Many people from opposition are against Kilicdaroglu being the candidate though. It seems like most of the people want Ekrem Imamoglu or Mansur Yavas.
→ More replies5
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23
The opposition alliance has not agreed on a candidate yet. It will likely be one of Imamoglu, Yavas, Aksener, Kilicdaroglu.
13
u/MrGaffe Jan 28 '23
Pretty much, their leader just wants to keep his seat of power so he’s using this as a pretext to get votes
→ More replies3
u/JesusWuta40oz Jan 28 '23
Turkey doesn't care. This is a bargaining chip for something for the EU or the US. Turkey is like China, they play all sides.
→ More replies31
u/BloodlustyGummybear Jan 28 '23
It was one person...
I assumed it was a large, organized book burning. It was one nut job.
→ More replies9
u/Judospark Jan 28 '23
Yeah this goofball burned the same book in a couple of midsize Swedish cities last spring, causing large scale riots.
→ More replies3
u/sammyhere Jan 29 '23
This guy has been doing it FOR YEARS in denmark, but his political party failed and people lost interest, which is why he moved to sweden.
He's a major piece of shit and did nazi dogwhistles/memes during live-debates.
48
u/ChrisTchaik Jan 28 '23
Turkey is horrible, but I see what Finland is doing here: a PR off-ramp. Erdogan gets to throw in an excuse to his Islamist supporters, in case his pre-election trick got too far.
9
u/Ftpini Jan 28 '23
It’s the same thing that undoes protests in the us. They insert a few “bad actors” who cause violence and use that violence to delegitimization the entire movement. It is very effective.
28
u/-Erro- Jan 28 '23
Why does Turkey have all this control?
84
Jan 28 '23
[deleted]
37
u/-Erro- Jan 28 '23
I feel like without the power to overrule, the more countries that join the greater the chances of something like this happenning again.
Does the rest of NATO have any say in this? Can they do anything about it or are they just at the mercy of a powertripping thanksgiving dinner?
108
u/Techercizer Jan 28 '23
Yes, everyone else in NATO has the ability to block a new member. They all have a say; Turkey is just the only one who is speaking up.
Unanimous agreement in a defense pact is kind of important because you are signing up to go to war and have your people die for another country.
→ More replies19
→ More replies7
u/Scereye Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
I feel like without the power to overrule, the more countries that join the greater the chances of something like this happenning again.
That's by design, though.
It's like a saying we have at work "if everything is important, nothing is important". In this case you have the situation that, if everyone is in the group, no-one is in the group. So you have to make it hard to grow at a certain point. And only with EXTREMELY positive impact it will work.
Now, at some point other members will remember turkeys actions when it comes to different negotiations... the question is... will Turkey know when they have to stop.
→ More replies4
u/kroxigor01 Jan 28 '23
You can't force a country to be military ally of someone they don't want to be.
I wonder if the rest of NATO minus Turkey could write up a be deal with Sweden and Finland in. Identical to the rest of the NATO treaty.
Basically two overlapping alliances. Kinda like how the USA has other alliances outside NATO with Japan, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, and I'm sure many more.
134
Jan 28 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies95
u/flukshun Jan 28 '23
Agreed. I'm referring specifically to how susceptible NATO's critical functions are to outside sabotage due to their brittle accession procedures.
→ More replies4
6
u/Green-Event813 Jan 28 '23
Is this the kinda shit that’s been holding our world and our way of life together?
Christ I want off this fucking ride, the people running the planet are all certifiably stupid individuals.
→ More replies→ More replies4
u/Corgi_Koala Jan 28 '23
Turkey's geopolitical position makes them extremely important and unfortunately gifts them a disproportionate amount of power within the alliance. It sucks but there's a pragmatic side to keeping them happy. If they left the alliance and became friendly or allied with Russia, it would be a massive blow to the stability of the region.
213
u/autotldr BOT Jan 28 '23
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 77%. (I'm a bot)
Finland's foreign minister hinted that Russia may have been involved in last week's Quran-burning protest that threatens to derail Sweden's accession to NATO. Rasmus Paludan, a far-right activist with dual Danish and Swedish citizenship, burned Islam's holy book in central Stockholm, leading Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to rule out supporting Sweden's entry into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
"There are forces both within Sweden and outside who wish to hinder Sweden's membership in NATO," Kristersson said.
Egypt's al-Azhar calls for boycotts over Quran burning in Sweden.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Sweden#1 Finland#2 NATO#3 Russia#4 countries#5
→ More replies
379
u/DonManuel Jan 28 '23
I'm not sure if the primary motive wasn't Erdoğan's reelection.
36
u/DrIGGI Jan 28 '23
That's the geopolitical game that all nations play on behalf of their own interests. The interpretation happens in the media which of course is also part of „the play“.
→ More replies15
386
u/inrego Jan 28 '23
Yeah, as a Dane, I unfortunately know too well about this guy.. he used to be in Denmark, and got way too many votes during election. He's been in the news a lot, for provocative protests, including throwing/burning the Quran many times, mostly in areas with many muslims. He'll do anything for attention. He's an idiot with a head injury (for real). He should just be ignored instead of given all this attention. In Denmark we started to ignore him, and not putting him on the news whenever he did stupid shit. He was alone with a few friends at all of his protests. Suddenly he brings up that he's actually also a Swedish citizen, and he moves there to start stirring up shit
120
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23
Paludan is just a useful idiot. The guy behind the protest is Chang Frick, a far-right activist with connections to Russia.
Swedish media learned that while Paludan, who also holds Swedish citizenship, traveled to Stockholm specifically for the protest, his application fee for the demonstration permit was paid by Frick. Paludan confirmed to the media that the idea to burn the Quran was proposed to him by Frick. He also guaranteed that any damage that Paludan could sustain as a result of this protest will be covered.
It was also conveniently timed to take place immediately before a visit of the Swedish defense minister to Turkey which was expectedly cancelled as a result of the Quran burning protest going ahead.
→ More replies23
u/ThatDerp1 Jan 28 '23
Why the fuck did paludan confirm th- right, moron.
42
u/SendMeNudesThough Jan 28 '23
And then when this all came out and Paludan realized his mistake because now the media is tying this all to Russia, Paludan went out and said he'd burn a Quran every Friday until Sweden is let into NATO. Sort of as if to say "See, it totally wasn't a Russia-backed operation to sabotage Sweden's NATO chances, I'm burning Qurans IN SUPPORT of Sweden!"
Paludan's just... An all-around idiot.
→ More replies→ More replies28
u/torridesttube69 Jan 28 '23
He got less than 2% of the votes?
→ More replies91
u/inrego Jan 28 '23
63.537 votes. Which is about 63.536 too many. Enough that he received a lot of money from our government.
Compared to Sweden where he got 156 votes.
3
u/5tormwolf92 Jan 28 '23
Compared in Sweden he got 156 nationally and the Socialist lost some seat in local government to alternatives.
While he did get riots as he wished, in the end he lost steam as he should have. But when he saw Erdogan getting threatened by hanging he saw a possible PR stunt. Now no riot as it was next to the US embassy.
→ More replies13
u/torridesttube69 Jan 28 '23
Yeah, okay.
My point was just that saying "he got way too many votes" comes across as if he was at least somewhat popular. But on the basis that any vote for him is too many, your comment makes sense.
10
1.7k
u/TheSoundOfTheLloris Jan 28 '23
Sorry, but who gives a fuck?
This guy has been burning the Quran for years and Turkey was never going to let Sweden join regardless. This is entirely about Turkey being utter tools and not respecting freedom of speech, with or without Russian funding
448
u/paddy_boomsticks Jan 28 '23
It's about erdogan trying to gin up support in the elections.
→ More replies67
u/Yorgonemarsonb Jan 28 '23
Think he’s trying to leverage that and more help with “terrorists” and whatever else he thinks he can get.
→ More replies176
u/Stolpskotta Jan 28 '23
He (the guy who burned the quran) is basically seen as a village idiot in both Sweden and Denmark.
We already know that he was asked to burn it outside of Turkeys embassy by an influencer who is working for the right wing political party “Swedish Demoracts” also known as SD. The influencer even paid the demonstration permit for him.
And you guessed it, SD have for a long time had rumors surrounding them of being influenced by Russia. Something they fully deny, but it just keeps popping up knew inconvenient links to the east for them.
39
u/sarabjorks Jan 28 '23
He stopped doing his bullshit in Denmark because people didn't take him seriously anymore. Coming to Skåne last year was just for finding new immigrants to rile up and make them look violent because the Swedes knew less about him
→ More replies17
u/Stolpskotta Jan 28 '23
Yeah, and when people stopped caring in Sweden he just stopped altogether since the point he wanted to prove wasn’t proven anymore.
This time it didn’t even seem like it was his idea to burn the book, he was just someone elses useful idiot.
58
u/Fluffiebunnie Jan 28 '23
And you guessed it, SD have for a long time had rumors surrounding them of being influenced by Russia. Something they fully deny, but it just keeps popping up knew inconvenient links to the east for them.
The SD leadership has been fully supporting Ukraine aid and condemning Russia since the February 2022 invasion. So whatever sympathies there were, seem to have flown out of the window at that stage.
→ More replies→ More replies24
u/DeficiencyOfGravitas Jan 28 '23
He (the guy who burned the quran) is basically seen as a village idiot in both Sweden and Denmark.
So? Even a village idiot is allowed to burn books without being attacked. Everyone is giving pass to the assault and trying a way to blame the victim.
→ More replies
112
u/Fortifical Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
I don't think that's the case. Burning the Quran is what he does, and he got permission from the police to do it. The journalist who paid the minimal fee, the case for him being a russian asset hasn't been presented imo.
→ More replies21
u/TheBunkerKing Jan 28 '23
Not to say I don't agree this kind of stupid stuff is definitely playing into the hands of Putin, but as a general rule it's not police's job to stop burning books.
At least here in Finland, and even more so in Sweden, you're allowed to be disrespectful towards people's beliefs, even when it means you're behaving like an idiot. But bad behaviour or being an annoying cunt doesn't need to be illegal.
→ More replies
506
Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
[deleted]
68
u/vooffle Jan 28 '23
While I agree, this is about the motive and not the act. Protesting and shooting down defence policy are very different things, even if done in the same act.
45
Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
[deleted]
37
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23
He's also strongly opposed to Sweden's NATO membership and he knew this was the easiest way to prevent it.
→ More replies84
u/OldMcFart Jan 28 '23
If one single idiot burning a book can stop the entire NATO from letting new members in, then the problem isn't the book burning.
→ More replies8
→ More replies125
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23 •
![]()
The fee for registering the protest was paid by a former RT presenter with known links to Russia. Paludan may have done a similar protest some years ago, but it's very obvious that this time the goal was to thwart Sweden's NATO bid which he's opposed to and which conveniently is also what Russia is opposed to.
38
u/Tuss Jan 28 '23
Paludan did a Sweden quran tour as late as this summer. I think it was 10+ or so towns and cities.
→ More replies→ More replies141
u/Professional-Error-3 Jan 28 '23
The fee is 30 dollars and was paid because Paludan doesn't have a Swedish account and the transaction wouldn't have gone through in time. The "Former RT presenter" did freelance work for RT and Ruptly many years ago - is obviously a right leaning guy - but has lately been outspoken against Russia.
Looking at the situation and concluding that it was likely a Russian act is so dumb.
→ More replies59
u/green_flash Jan 28 '23
It goes further than that:
Paludan confirmed to the media that the idea to burn the Quran was proposed to him by Frick. He also guaranteed that any damage that Paludan could sustain as a result of this protest will be covered.
→ More replies70
Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies89
u/iamtheshade Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
What have the Koreans done to him? Were his neighbors blasting kpop at night? Was he force fed kimchi? Did his Samsung phone not get updated after Android 13 was released? I've got so many questions...
→ More replies
155
u/evkr__ Jan 28 '23
This is a conspiracy theory.
The Dane/Swede has been doing this for 10 years.
59
u/Falsus Jan 28 '23
Russia has supported extreme right activists for a lot longer than that. And the person who planned the quran burning outside of the Turkish embassy has ties to Russia.
18
u/ramiabouzahra Jan 28 '23
Frick? The closest ties he has to Russia is his Russian wife
→ More replies12
u/Norwedditor Jan 28 '23
I mean he has done some, arguably excellent, reporting from inside the actual election process in Russia and covered a member of SD going there on election observer work. It's surprising work and a surprising exposé all around. I wonder how it was actually made possible because I don't think we will ever see something like it. It doesn't imply anything nefarious though but it is obvious someone must have said "OK". Whatever Frick knows it or not.
→ More replies8
19
u/popeyepaul Jan 28 '23 edited Jan 28 '23
We are frankly giving Russia too much credit if we think that behind every unfortunate event is the evil mastermind Putin pulling the strings. If anything we are seeing that they are woefully inept especially considering the budgets they are operating with and Putin is a secluded paranoid old man too busy looking over his own shoulder to be concerned about anything that is happening outside of his tiny circle. The American elections for example haven't worked in their favor recently when they really would have needed it.
Russia does not have motive to do this because it doesn't benefit them in any way because 1) Turkey wasn't going to let them in anyway, and 2) Erdogan knows about free speech laws in the West, he just pretends not to when it suits him. This is him 100% choosing to be offended when he could have just as easily ignored the whole thing. There does not exist any reality where any Western country starts arresting protesters on behalf of a far away dictator, and Erdogan knows that too.
→ More replies→ More replies60
u/LameBasist Jan 28 '23
Russia supporting alt-right in europe is not a conspiracy theory but a fact.
19
u/throwawayski2 Jan 28 '23
I do not think you did so with any bad intention, but can we please not start calling far-right 'alt-right' in Europe? It is a self-chosen name by American nationalists to sound more moderate and thus appealing.
We don't have to do the additional effort and legitimize these loons even more by using the same term in Europe.
→ More replies→ More replies8
118
u/GenericBritishChap Jan 28 '23
So let me get this straight, there’s people in this thread (and evidently the foreign minister of an apparently smart, modern nation) who believe that Russia “funded” this because some reporter paid the 30 dollar protest application fee?
Are people this stupid, or has propaganda really rotted people’s brains this badly?
55
u/BadYabu Jan 28 '23
Swedish media learned that while Paludan, who also holds Swedish citizenship, traveled to Stockholm specifically for the protest, his application fee for the demonstration permit was paid by Frick. Paludan confirmed to the media that the idea to burn the Quran was proposed to him by Frick. He also guaranteed that any damage that Paludan could sustain as a result of this protest will be covered. source
→ More replies22
u/NervousJ Jan 28 '23
It's the result of decades of biased mass media. You can say pretty much whatever you want and have it published if you're picking an acceptable target as defined by the media cathedral. What we see here is an expansion of fear mongering nonsense articles we used to see daily about Trump. Same game, different stooge.
→ More replies8
100
u/Bakanyanter Jan 28 '23
Conspiracy theory alert. Not everything has to do with Russia.
→ More replies35
u/cadaada Jan 28 '23
russia somehow cant even keep its military organized, but can terrorize the entire fucking world not only in the internet but in real life too. Impressive really.
→ More replies
16
37
u/liamjphillips Jan 28 '23
Burning someone's magic book shouldn't really be this important in 2023.
→ More replies
57
u/jab136 Jan 28 '23
Burning a symbol is a legitimate use of free speech. I don't always agree with your stated or actual reasons for doing it, but I will support your ability to do it.
→ More replies
64
u/Jdobalina Jan 28 '23
Russia is awful for invading Ukraine, but you can’t blame literally every problem with your country on them. I mean, I would also love for them to find out who bombed the Nord Stream pipeline, but they don’t seem interested in exploring that.
→ More replies
10
u/smokedspirit Jan 28 '23
If that guy is and they have proof he was acting on behalf of Russia then arrest him. Charge him with being a foreign agent
Otherwise this is just speculation
6
u/rgpc64 Jan 28 '23
Dirty deeds are part of the playbook and get worse when they are winning. There is no choice other than a united front against Russias aggression.
18
u/MainCareless Jan 28 '23
Oh yes, Russia does this kind of shit all the time. They study cultures and then try to start shit between people to create “incidents” that serve their motives. They tried to start a civil war in the US. We should all team up and just tear Russia to pieces as a world. They think that we won’t. They need an attitude adjustment!
→ More replies
56
u/Ankhsou
Jan 28 '23
•
Nowaday if u have any problem i ur country its the russian fault. Thats pretty easy
→ More replies
29
u/plu7o89 Jan 28 '23
Burn more imo, throw some bibles in there too.
Modern countries facilitate free speech and political action. This is all nonsense
17
u/akbermo Jan 28 '23
But why is the Swastika banned in Germany? Why is burning the French flag banned in France? Are they not modern countries?
→ More replies13
26
u/HouseOfSteak Jan 28 '23
The book burner hates freedom of expression and his party would see religions he doesn't like banned.
He's not in your corner, don't talk yourself into thinking that.
→ More replies→ More replies3
12
u/CrudelyAnimated Jan 28 '23
Hints? May have been? Wasn't this confirmed and published in worldwide news like two days ago?
→ More replies10
u/Eyadish Jan 28 '23
In no way confirmed, far from that. But events, relations and stuff does add up
5.0k
u/chilu0222 Jan 28 '23 •
So before the Qur'an burning last week, Turkey was ready to support Sweden to enter NATO?